In the London Evening Standard, there is a short article
where the title states – 86,000 for rebrand with logo ‘drawn by child with a
rebrand marker’. Firstly, the title of the article is nothing but an opinion
being presented there to be made off as a fact to try and draw in the reader to
read the bodytext of the article. This is a common ploy utilized by writers who
work for newspaper comapnies to try and make the readers perform the action of
turning to the next page. This isn’t to be unexpected
In the content of the body text, the writer, Joseph Watts,
who is a Political Correspondent as stated from the byline of the article,
explains how the London council is spending 86,000 on a re-brand of which
includes a new logo for a company called “Haringey”; supposedly based in
London. However the article doesn’t even state what kind of company Haringey is
or what they do as a business, this adds as a motive to motivate negative views
on this subject in order to coincide with the writer’s own negative opinion on
this topic at hand.
Instead of just trying to tell the reader how the logo is
going to be changed and re-vamped, the writer seems to try and de* the London
council, branding them as “CASH-STRAPPED”, in an attempt to demoralize the
local council which would then in turn anger and provoke the readers to an
extent. The adjective “CASH-STRAPPED” is written at the very start of the
article in capital letters to catch the readers eye and signify the importance
of how the council is wasting the civilians’ hard earned money on petty issues
like this.
I think you could improve by including you're personal opinion on the newspaper article.
ReplyDeleteyou have explained in detail about the story and how it has been shown in the news. To improve you could put your opinion about the story
ReplyDelete